Web3 / iGamingVerified results

Wallet-Verified iGaming Acquisition Before Deposit Launch

A Web3-native iGaming operator used Claimr to build and qualify an engaged player pipeline before opening real-money play.

Measured outcomes

From acquisition to qualified value

80%

Lower acquisition cost

Claimr organic channel vs paid KOL on identical campaign budget.

59%

Referral-sourced acquisition

Acquired through the organic in-product referral channel.

67%

Activation rate

Completed at least one task after signup.

34.1%

Paid-tier conversion

Minted a paid NFT after activation.

9.8%

High-LTV qualifier rate

$500+ wallet threshold in the analyzed cohort.

Challenge

The operator needed to fill its CRM with verified, high-value prospects before deposits opened. Traditional paid channels could supply volume, but not the qualification needed to separate genuine players from Sybil and bonus-abuse traffic.

Why the previous approach fell short

Search, social and paid-KOL acquisition were optimized for reach. Qualification happened too late, after acquisition spend had already been committed, while most engagement disappeared after the first reward cycle.

Claimr implementation

gamification

A tiered engagement program created a clear progression from signup through activation and paid-tier conversion.

tracking

On-chain wallet analysis began at signup, giving the operator a verified acquisition signal before deposit activity existed.

referral

An organic in-product referral channel ran alongside paid KOL on the same campaign budget for a direct cost comparison.

intelligence

Wallet-verified players were continuously scored against the operator's high-LTV criteria and surfaced to the CRM in real time.

rewards

On-chain reward delivery and paid-NFT progression were embedded inside the operator's product experience.

Mechanics used

White-label engagementIn-product referralsWallet analysisHigh-LTV scoringTiered progressionOn-chain rewards

How to read the results

Results reflect a wallet-verified, pre-deposit pipeline. The acquisition-cost comparison used identical campaign budgets; the remaining rates describe the analyzed campaign cohort and should not be read as referral-only conversion rates.

Build a lower-cost, qualified acquisition pipeline