14,500 participants minted. Two-thirds minted again.

The campaign report describes the program mechanics and fees. Participant, task and mint counts were checked against the campaign export, which also supports the funnel, timing and day-specific activity analysis. Figures are rounded; percentages use unrounded counts. Deleted participant records are excluded.

Participants and time windows

The export contains 78,951 participant records: 76,351 were created in the nine charted weeks, 17 before and 2,583 afterward. Headline counts and the funnel use the full retained export. The timeline uses the nine-week window shown in the original report. Participant records do not establish unique people or wallets.

Activation and mint completions

Activation requires at least one task marked completed in the export. Mint completions use the histories of NFT mint tasks identified through task-event records. The export confirms mint activity, but does not provide historical prices for each mint; fee amounts and paid mechanics remain sourced from the original report.

Completed tasks by channel

The channel chart counts 1,677,183 tasks marked completed, grouped by the platform recorded on each task. Forms and code drops combine the common-task and form-platform categories. Repeated check-in activity is excluded. Mint task records and individual mint-history events are different measures; the 62,087 mint-completion headline uses history events. Repeated events establish additional mints, not necessarily a separate visit.

Referral qualification

A qualified referral bought the entry-level mint and reached 3,000 points. The report recomputed qualification from task records. No traceable referrer includes sign-ups without a referral link and those whose referrer’s record no longer exists.

Mint fees

The campaign report defines mint fees as the sum across completed paid-mint tasks, in ETH. They are not net revenue, profit or an ROI calculation. Weekly amounts are rounded. The report attributes 46% of fees to mints that awarded no points; that reward configuration does not establish buyer motivations.

First-mint timing

Timing measures the time from joining to the first mint recorded within the nine-week reporting window, for participants who joined and minted in that window. It excludes 385 participants whose first in-window mint predates their recorded join timestamp, leaving 13,643 eligible minters. The result describes observed minters, not the conversion rate or waiting time of all sign-ups.

Day-specific activity

Reported check-in streaks describe participation within the season, not retention after it ended or the isolated effect of rewards. The day-specific activity table includes core-season participants with a completed task during their first 24 hours and a full observation window. Day 7 means recorded task activity from 168 to 192 hours after joining; day 30 means 720 to 744 hours. Recurring task histories count as activity. Eligible populations are 48,881 and 41,554 respectively. This differs from the original report’s 34% with any activity on or after day 30.

Scope of the evidence

These results describe one campaign. Segment comparisons are observational. The report applied no bot filtering beyond the campaign’s qualification rules; qualification is not proof of identity or freedom from abuse.