Find the engaged audience behind 3.3M signups.

The supplied report was reconciled with the campaign configuration and full participant export. Figures are rounded publicly; the definitions below explain the grouping and evidence behind them.

Cohort and timing

The export contains 3,310,384 distinct participant IDs, including 1,624,145 with at least one completed task and 1,686,239 with none. It is a full-snapshot cohort, not a strict six-week-only count. Most participation relates to the September–October 2024 season; completion history spans August 6–November 8, 2024. Two later signup records date to 2025 and have no completed tasks. Counts describe accounts, not independently verified unique people.

How the groups were defined

The broader-task group contains 171,826 accounts with at least one completed task outside referral-link creation, wallet connection and the article form. The basic-task-only group contains 1,452,319 accounts whose completions were confined to those three task types. This retrospective classification was not a live campaign filter or an automated fraud verdict. No account in the export has its bot flag set; that does not establish the absence of bots.

Task depth and social profiles

The two active groups average 16.5 and 2.9 completed task records per account. The broader group has 170,009 accounts with a linked X profile (98.9%); the basic-only group has 349 (0.024%). Linking an X account is not human identity verification. Across the export, 7,115,955 completed task records include 4,699 repeated participant/task/quest records. One record lacks completion history. Record counts are not unique real-world actions.

Activity after joining

In the broader-task group, 53,963 accounts (31.4%) have a completion on a UTC date after signup, and 35,783 (20.8%) have one at least 168 hours after signup. The basic-only group has 6,150 (0.42%) and 51 (0.0035%) respectively. These are descriptive activity measures, not session returns, exact-day D7 retention or causal improvements. Follow-up time varies, and the groups are defined using their eventual behavior. Excluding three broader-group accounts that joined less than seven days before the final recorded completion leaves the rounded 21% unchanged.

Partner quest correction

Across four studios, 81,617 participant–studio pairs completed at least one configured task. Only 33,207 completed both the follow and link task, so the original report’s roughly 82,000 completed quests is relabeled as participation. The link tasks have 33,497 completed records across those studios. These records do not establish completed registration, gameplay, unique website visitors or new player acquisition. A participant can count once per studio.

Holding checks and Gem NFTs

A total of 2,102 participants completed a balance check on at least one chain; each task was configured with a 20-token minimum and weekly recurrence. Of them, 957 (45.5%, rounded to 46%) qualified in two or more Monday–Sunday UTC calendar weeks, and 379 in four or more. The report’s 44% is replaced with this explicit, reproducible week definition. Calendar-week qualifications need not be seven days apart. They do not prove continuous holding, new purchases or current balances. The Gem NFT task has 1,782 participants and 1,806 history events. A separate generic mint task is excluded because its configuration uses a placeholder contract.

Social completion methods

There are 2,387,226 completed X task records: 913,900 use intent-based like, repost or comment task types; 1,473,326 use follow, repost, comment or post task types without the intent suffix. Intent completions do not independently prove the external action occurred. Profile screenshot tasks are separate and are not included in this X-task total. The export records completion status, not current external content, impressions or reach.